A letter to Aristotle
Aristotle,
You’ve made the world a more orderly
place through categories and classification. By explaining final and efficient cause,
you shed light on why things happen
and how. Through eudemonia, you
helped people understand their ultimate happiness is largely up to them. While I’m
grateful for those things, I most treasure your contribution to logic.
Thank
you for building your reasoning on the assumption absolute truth exists. You
once said: “To say that what is is not, or that what is not is, is false and to
say that what is is, or that what is not is not, is true.” [1]
I agree. As you said, the validity of an argument is based on the legitimacy of
its premises and the relationship between them— not on popular opinion (or nomos). Thus, true arguments and those
that convince sometimes differ.
Now,
you are probably wondering if this is going to be more than a thank you note.
It is. I want to ask
some questions— in case anything important fell through the cracks of history
or the cracks in my head.
Do
you think there’s such thing as situational truth? Are some things a matter of
opinion? Can anything be neither true nor false? And, when we weigh arguments,
can we ever understand all the premises involved and their intertwined
relationships enough to be conclusive? I have some thoughts, but I would love
to hear yours.
Sincerely,
Adam
[1]
Aristotle, R. B. (1963). The Philosophy of
Aristotle. New York: New American Library.
Comments
Post a Comment